Message Board

Newbie/Basic Questions

Older Posts ]   [ Newer Posts ]
 SpamRBL
Author: J.SEMCZYK2   (7 Feb 05 1:26am)
May be I am not looking into the right place but is this providing a RBL so that we could use this database ?

Thanks

JoN
 
 Re: SpamRBL
Author: M.Prince   (7 Feb 05 1:39am)
So far we've been hesitant to share our list of mail server IPs with traditional RBLs. The reason why is that the mail server data is fairly easily manipulatable. Imagine, for example, if a spammer were to sign up for the Project and install a honey pot. He could then harvest email addresses he knows to be spam traps and then use those to sign up for legitimate mailing lists. If we blindly block the IPs of anyone who sends us a message then we risk opening ourselves to this kind of abuse.

We have agreed to share data with the SURBL, which lists the URLs that appear in spam messages and allow mail server admins to filter based on them. I'm more comfortable doing this because the SURBL guys approve each new domain by hand and maintain an extensive white list. Our SURBL feed got hung up while we fixed some other small issues, but it should go online soon.

We are working on what we believe will be a new tool: a way for website admins to block known harvesters. Tentitively known as the http:BL, we'll put more information about it on our website as soon as it's up and running. There will also be more information at:

http://www.httpbl.org/

Our goal is to make it free for everyone who is an active member of Project Honey Pot.

Finally, we need to walk a fine line when we give out information. One of our main goals is to provide both public and private law enforcement the data necessary to bring successful prosecutions. There's some element of surprise necessary to a successful legal action.

We're working with officials in order to make sure that anything we release publicly won't compromise any future legal actions. And... rest assured... the legal actions against harvesters are coming...
 
 Re: SpamRBL
Author: H.Martin   (1 Oct 05 12:36pm)
I was wondering about the lack of RBLs -- this explanation AT LEAST makes sense.

SURBL is good.

Using the list direclty would be better BUT...

...NOT if the spammer could polute the list easily.

--
Herb Martin
HerbM@LearnQuick.Com
 
 Re: SpamRBL
Author: D.Hoviss   (26 Jan 06 3:13pm)
I would like to use this www.httpbl.org/
for multiple mail servers, can you tell me more about it?

Would this kind of service work better for a company that makes mail server software, where they could build in connectivity to this list or would it be just another RBL?

Thanks
Daniel HOviss



do not follow this link

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | About Project Honey Pot | FAQ | Cloudflare Site Protection | Contact Us

Copyright © 2004–25, Unspam Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.

contact | wiki | email